One caveat was the Openness scale, whose performance differed before and after IRT. Additionally, the external correlations illustrated that scoring low on Neuroticism and higher on the other four traits may help adolescents achieve greater levels

of competence across different domains of functioning. Such a personality profile may be of value in studies of adolescent development and contribute to understanding individual differences in treatment response for common mental illnesses in the adolescent Galunisertib years. IRT identified a large minority of items that did not discriminate well. Studies of the NEO-FFI in adolescents have found many items do not load sufficiently on any factor or cross load onto unintended factors. This is particularly the

case for Extraversion, Agreeableness and Openness, whilst Neuroticism and Conscientiousness tend to perform better (Parker and Stumpf, Anti-diabetic Compound Library cell assay 1998 and Sneed et al., 2002). The results of the current study suggest these findings are likely due to a lack of discriminatory power of many items, suggesting they are not measuring the underlying latent traits strongly. Previous studies report few difficulties with item comprehension (De Fruyt et al., 2000 and McCrae et al., 2005), therefore it is unlikely the lack of discrimination reflects a limited understanding of the questions. Perhaps many of the trait indicators fail to discriminate appropriately on the latent traits because the items are not referencing Bcl-w ideas or behaviours that are relevant to the cultural milieu of adolescents (Sneed et al., 2002). Additionally, the threshold data demonstrated that for the majority of items only people over three standard deviations away from the population mean responded to the categories ‘strongly agree’ and/or ‘strongly disagree’. Compared to published norms this

sample had lower Neuroticism and higher Agreeableness, which may somewhat explain these results. However it did not differ on Openness, Extraversion or Conscientiousness suggesting for the current trait indicators these response categories only have limited utility for most adolescents in the general population. Thalmayer et al. (2011) found brief personality questionnaires had similar levels of predictive ability and argued that scales comprised of a few high-validity items may obtain equal predictive validity to those of their longer counterparts. The result from the present study support these assertions as the more discriminating items allowed a reduction in scale length that was just as externally valid. Nonetheless, the Agreeableness and Openness items discriminated poorly; with IRT affecting the Openness scale’s performance. Thus use of these shortened scales must be done so with caution. As half of the indicators were not strongly measuring the latent traits questions arise as to what constructs these scales may be evaluating.