“Haemophilia A (HA) patients


“Haemophilia A (HA) patients GDC-0941 mw with high responding inhibitors require therapies with bypassing agents to control bleedings or Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) to attempt inhibitor eradication and restore FVIII therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the therapeutic management and product consumption of HA inhibitor patients and the relative costs

in Italy. A retrospective survey was performed utilizing data from the National Registry of Congenital Coagulopathies and from a specific questionnaire on product consumption of HA inhibitor patients over the year 2011. Among HA patients, 10% had currently detectable inhibitors; 24% of patients were undergoing ITI (mostly children) and 76% utilized bypassing agents. Patients on ITI consumed 45 000 000 IU of FVIII (median consumption/patient of 1 200 000 IU year−1). Patients receiving bypassing agents utilized 21 000 000 IU of aPCC (median consumption/patient of 360 000 IU year−1), and 38 000 mg of rFVIIa (median consumption/patient of 440 mg year−1). The annual cost/patient on ITI and on bypassing agents therapy was analysed. Recombinant products represen-ted the product of choice for children therapies in >90% of the cases. FVIII prophylaxis of severe HA patients without inhibitor

costs about half than therapy with bypassing LY294002 agents and is three times less expensive than prophylaxis with such agents. Therefore, the possibility to restore FVIII prophylaxis, having eradicated the inhibitor through ITI, can justify the high costs of ITI treatment needed in the short term. Consistent with this notion, over the last years a 50% increase in the number of patients undergoing ITI in Italy was registered. “
“The ADVATE (rAHF-PFM)

Prophylaxis Study compared the efficacy of (i) standard factor (F) VIIII prophylaxis (SP) (20–40 IU kg−1 every other day) vs. pharmacokinetic-tailored prophylaxis (PKP) (20–80 IU kg−1 every third day) and (ii) both prophylactic regimens with on-demand therapy (OD) in 66 previously on-demand-treated patients (median age: 26 years; range: 7–59) with FVIII ≤2% and ≥8 joint haemorrhages in the year before enrolment. The aim of this study was to evaluate joint bleeding episodes during the on-demand and prophylactic study periods. 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl A post hoc analysis of joint bleeding episodes in the per protocol analysis set (n = 53) was conducted. The annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR) was significantly lower for subjects treated with 12 months of SP (n = 30) or PKP (n = 23) as compared with 6 months of OD (n = 53): 55 median AJBR 0.48 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.96], 72 [1.00 (4.07)] and 1164 [38.65 (24.81)] respectively (P < 0.0001). Median AJBR was comparable during both prophylaxis arms (0.5 and 1.0 respectively). In contrast, median AJBR during on-demand therapy was 38.7 (P < 0.0001). Both SP and PKP significantly increased the median number of days between joint bleeding episodes compared with OD: 268.9, 182.9 and 7.4 respectively (P < 0.0001).

Comments are closed.