Hence, SD-4 gene deficiency appears to have little to no impact on leucocyte development. Moreover, up to 1 year of age, we observed no morphological nor developmental abnormality. Using functional blockade of SD-4 by antibody or Fc-fusion proteins, we showed previously that SD-4 is the ligand through which DC-HIL mediates its inhibitory function. To study the influence of SD-4 expression on
the regulation of T-cell function, we first examined the capacity of T cells from SD-4 KO mice to mediate the inhibitory function of DC-HIL (Fig. 2). Specificity of the gene deficiency was confirmed by the inability of T cells to express SD-4 after activation (high expression by WT-T cells, see Supplementary RAD001 manufacturer material, Fig. S1), even as they were capable of expressing another inhibitory
molecule, PD-1 (Fig. 2a). We then examined the binding of activated T cells to DC-HIL (Fig. 2b), and found that those from WT mice bound strongly to soluble DC-HIL receptor (DC-HIL-Fc), whereas those from KO mice did not. Thereafter, we examined the ability of immobilized DC-HIL-Fc to inhibit T-cell activation triggered by anti-CD3 antibody. CD4+ T cells from WT or KO mice were cultured with immobilized anti-CD3 antibody (increasing doses) and DC-HIL-Fc (constant dose), and their activation was measured as proliferation. Selleck Napabucasin DC-HIL-Fc strongly inhibited proliferation of SD-4+/+ CD4+ T cells activated by anti-CD3 antibody at doses < 0·3 μg/ml, although doses > 1 μg/ml rescued the inhibition (Fig. 2c), consistent with our previous results using T cells from BALB/c mice.[6, 7] By contrast, the presence or absence of DC-HIL-Fc had no effect on the proliferation of similarly activated SD-4−/− CD4+ T cells. Loss of responsiveness to DC-HIL was also true for SD-4-deficient CD8+ T cells (Fig. 2d). We also probed the effect of SD-4 deficiency on cytokine expression by anti-CD3 antibody-activated
Dynein T cells in the presence or absence of DC-HIL-Fc (Fig. 2e). Interleukin-2 and tumour necrosis factor-α (for CD4+ T cells), and IL-2 and interferon-γ (for CD8+ T cells) were assayed from supernatants of T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 antibody (0·3 μg/ml) plus DC-HIL-Fc or control immunoglobulin. In the absence of DC-HIL (anti-CD3 and control immunoglobulin), there was no significant difference in cytokine production by WT versus KO T cells (CD4+ or CD8+). Consistent with our previous data, co-treatment with DC-HIL markedly inhibited the production of cytokines by SD-4+/+ T cells, whereas it failed to do so for SD-4−/− T cells. Rather, it caused some up-regulation compared with anti-CD3 alone. These results indicate that SD-4 is exclusively responsible for mediating the T-cell-inhibitory function of DC-HIL. SD-4−/− T cells showed similarly strong responsiveness to anti-CD3 antibody stimulation, compared with SD-4+/+ control cells (Fig. 2c,d).