Due to this absence, their pairs may make an unusual disulfide bridge ( Fig. 5). Jayanthi et al. [26] show, through molecular dynamics simulations, that the first and the last disulfide bridges in EAFP2 do not generate clear

structural modifications. The molecular model from XP_001804616 also indicates similar structural process, since the overall folding is the same as others. The second remarkable difference relies on the key residues involved in chitin-binding. Instead of one serine and Anti-diabetic Compound Library three aromatic residues, fungal peptide has one serine, one asparagine and two aromatic residues. Interestingly, in CBP1 from M. grisea an aromatic residue is also lacking in the position Xi+2. Changes in the key residues may result in changes in the chitin affinity,

the serine to aspartate mutation in HEV32 reduces the affinity to (GlcNAc)3 by almost half [10]. This mutation in Xi+2 is probably involved in its actual function. Although the predictions indicate that XP_001804616 (P. nodorum) has antimicrobial activity, it may be a virulence factor. The chitin-binding protein Avr4 form Cladosporium fulvum protects the chitin wall against hydrolysis by plant chitinases through its chitin-binding ability [59]. Chitin protection has also been proposed for several predicted proteins from M. grisea, with the pattern CX(5)CCX(7)C, related to chitin-binding proteins [13]. In addition, the CBP1 protein from M. grisea plays a crucial role in appressorium differentiation, a prerequisite for penetration into host plants [29]. Naturally, a novel question about the evolution GPCR Compound Library of hevein domains emerges, since the current propositions were made based only on hevein domains from plants. Do hevein domains have a common ancestor or did they arise

by co-evolution? This question will remain unclear at least until more fungal proteins with hevein domains Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II have been discovered. As novel fungal sequences are found, they may shed some light on the evolution and the mechanisms of chitin binding of the hevein domain. At least molecular models indicate that there are no clear differences among the structures of fungal and plant hevein-like peptides. The rigid model structures from the peptides here reported are very similar to each other (Table 3) and to other lectins with the hevein domain with solved structures (Fig. S4). They also have a similar behavior in molecular dynamics simulations. Independently of the peptide, the hevein domain keeps its fold since the structure is knotted by at least three disulfide bonds. The hevein domain is so stable that when an elevated variation in the backbone’s RMSD is observed (Fig. 4), the RMS fluctuation is only improved on loop regions (Fig. S2). Even when there is losing of secondary structure, as observed in CBI18789 (V. vinifera), the peptides keep interacting with (GlcNAc)3 ( Fig. S1). On the other hand, the greater difference between the hevein-like peptide from P.