During the study period, 95 patients were scanned using 3 differe

During the study period, 95 patients were scanned using 3 different scanner models-64-slice multidetector CT (64-MDCT) AG-881 and first- (64-DSCT)

and second-generation (128-DSCT) dual-source CT-and 3 scan protocols-retrospective ECG-gated helical scanning (RG), prospective ECG-triggered axial scanning (PT), or prospective ECG-triggered high-pitch helical scanning (HPH). Effective dose (ED) was calculated with the dose length product method with a conversion factor (k) adjusted for age. ED was then compared among scan protocols. Image quality was extracted from clinical cCTA reports when available. Overall, 94 % of scans were diagnostic (80 % for 64-slice MDCT, 93 % for 64-slice DSCT, and 97 % for 128-slice DSCT).With 128-DSCT, median ED (1.0 [range 0.6-2.0] mSv) decreased by 85.8 % and 66.8 % compared with 64-MDCT (6.8 [range 2.9-13.6] mSv) and 64-DSCT (2.9 [range 0.9-4.1] mSv), respectively. With HPH, median ED (0.9 [range 0.6-1.8] mSv) decreased by 59.4 % and 85.4 % compared with PT (2.2 [range 0.9-3.4] mSv) and RG (6.1 [range 2.5-10.6] mSv). cCTA can now be obtained at very low radiation doses in pediatric patients using the latest dual-source CT technology in combination with prospective ECG-triggered HPH acquisition.”
“Background: When presented with different sounds in each ear (dichotic

listening), healthy subjects typically show a preference for stimuli https://www.selleckchem.com/PD-1-PD-L1.html heard in the right ear, an effect termed “”right ear advantage”". Previous studies examining right ear advantage in schizophrenia have been inconsistent, showing either decreased or increased advantage relative to comparison subjects. Given evidence for enhanced semantic processing in schizophrenia, some of this inconsistency may be due to the type of stimuli presented (words or syllables). The present study examined right ear advantage in patients and controls using both words and syllables as stimuli.

Methods:

Right ear advantage was compared between 20 patients with schizophrenia and 17 healthy controls. Two versions of the task were used, ie, a consonant-vowel pairing task and a fused rhymed words task.

Results: A significant group x task interaction was observed. Relative to Selisistat datasheet healthy controls, patients showed a greater difference on the syllable-based task compared with the word-based task. The number of distractors marked during the syllable-based task was inversely correlated with score on the Global Assessment of Function Scale.

Conclusion: The findings are consistent with a left hemisphere dysfunction in schizophrenia, but also suggest that differences may be stimulus-specific, with a relative sparing of the deficit in the context of word stimuli. Performance may be related to measures of social, occupational, and psychological function.

Comments are closed.