In hypothalamic membrane preparations, a significantly higher FRET signal is observed (198 ± 27, compared to background, 100 ± 5.7, p < 0.05; Figure 8A) in agreement with relative levels of receptor mRNA (Figure 1). To test specificity, we repeated the Tr-FRET assays on membrane preparations of brain tissues from ghsr+/+ and ghsr−/− mice in parallel. Significantly higher this website FRET signals are observed

in hypothalamus from ghsr+/+ mice compared to ghsr−/− mice (p < 0.05; Figure 8B), illustrating the specificity of the Tr-FRET signal in the hypothalamus of wild-type mice. Again, Tr-FRET signals in the striatum did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 8B). We then tested for GHSR1a:DRD2 heteromers in brain slices from ghsr+/+ and ghsr−/− mice. In the hypothalamus of ghsr+/+, but not ghsr−/−, mice, confocal FRET analysis shows that GHSR1a and DRD2 are in close proximity with a relative distance of 5–6 nm (50–60 Å) and FRET intensity ranging from 0.4 to 0.6 ( Figure 8C). In the striatum, FRET intensity signals are very weak ( Figure 8C). To summarize, Tr-FRET analysis of membrane preparations

and FRET analysis from single neurons by confocal find more microscopy confirm heteromer formation between natively expressed GHSR1a and DRD2 in the hypothalamus of wild-type mice. The in vivo detection of GHSR1a:DRD2 heteromers and in vitro cell-based data led us to ask whether preventing formation of GHSR1a:DRD2 heteromers would be associated with an altered behavioral phenotype. DRD2 activation suppresses appetite (Comings et al., 1996, Epstein et al., 2007 and Stice et al., 2008). In cells coexpressing GHSR1a and DRD2 the DRD2 selective agonist old cabergoline induces a dose-dependent mobilization of Ca2+ (Figure S7A), and treating mice with cabergoline (0.5 and 2 mg/kg) results in dose-dependent suppression of food intake (Figure S7B); therefore, to test whether cabergoline’s effect was dependent upon GHSR1a and DRD2 interactions, we compared food intake in ghsr+/+ and ghsr−/− treated with cabergoline. In ghsr+/+ mice, food intake is markedly reduced within 2 hr of cabergoline treatment compared

to vehicle-treated mice (p < 0.05; Figure 8D, left graph), whereas food intake in ghsr−/− mice is unaffected by cabergoline treatment ( Figure 8D, right graph). In cells coexpressing GHSR1a and DRD2, the GHSR1a neutral antagonist, JMV2959 (Moulin et al., 2007) attenuates dopamine-induced Ca2+ mobilization (Figure 7C). To test if inhibition of DRD2 signaling by JMV2959 in cells would translate to the whole animal we treated wild-type mice with JMV2959 prior to cabergoline treatment. Indeed, cabergoline-induced suppression of food intake in ghsr+/+ mice was prevented by pretreatment with JMV2959 (0.2 mg/kg, Figure 8E, left graph), whereas food intake in cabergoline-treated ghsr−/− mice was unaffected by JMV2959 treatment ( Figure 8E, right graph).