This may also explain why AmOrSil did not colocalize with flotillins in H441 in coculture indicating a slower or narrowed uptake behaviour in the coculture. The uptake for AmOrSil could not be detected with higher incubation times or concentrations (Fig. Nutlin 3a 5C). This may lead to the conclusion that this material is likely to be inert in the lung in vivo. Whether differences of NP uptake in MC or CC occur seems to depend also on the nanoparticle properties as already mentioned in the cytotoxicity section. These inert properties are giving

the prospect of a well-controlled and targeted uptake when further specific modifications are conducted to target a distinct uptake route or site or even a cell type (e.g. alveolar macrophages). Hermanns et al. [28] described comparable Fulvestrant chemical structure uptake results for PEI (poly(ethyleneimine)) in MC compared to the H441 in CC. In addition, our recent study showed that the cells maintained under coculture conditions displayed a higher resistance upon aSNP exposure as monitored by membrane integrity (LDH assay) and an increased sensitivity based on the inflammatory responses (sICAM, IL6 and IL-8) [9]. This indicates that the amount of NPs taken up, which was dramatically reduced

in the coculture compared to the conventional monoculture, correlates with the cytotoxic effects. A comparison of the nanoparticle uptake behaviour of epithelial (H441) and endothelial cells (ISO-HAS-1) would also be very interesting, since endothelial cells Dichloromethane dehalogenase differ from epithelial cells in regard to their physiological function, and reflected in differences in morphology, membrane composition and the less restrictive barrier compared to epithelial

cells. Unfortunately, quantification via fluorescence intensity measurements is not possible due to the different cellular properties, which are mentioned above. This might lead to a putative different agglomeration behaviour of internalised NPs, which leads to an altered fluorescence light scattering and therewith to unprecise measurements. A more precise quantification method would be with ICP-AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry) which has previously been shown to be a unique and precise method [29] and [30] to quantify and compare gold nanoparticle uptake in epithelial and endothelial cells. Nevertheless, in MCs colocalisation of NPs with flotillin-1/2 was observed as soon as 4 h after exposure in ISO-HAS-1, indicating a faster uptake mechanism compared to H441, which showed a colocalisation first after 4 h/20 h (data not shown). Since cellular uptake as well as transcytosis or transport processes of molecules via membrane vesicles or caveolae are a hallmark of endothelial cells, this might explain the faster uptake compared to the epithelial cells (H441) [31]. According to the transport studies of NPs across the lung barrier model, the NP-exposed epithelial layer displayed a functional barrier in vitro that prevented a direct passage through the transwell.