791 g and 0.828 g SFA per 120 g (data not shown). In Brazil, at present, both MF–I and MF–WPC could not receive the comparative “reduced saturated fat” claim (Table 7), once a reduction of at least 25% less saturated fat and a difference higher

than 1.5 g/100 g in buy Dasatinib this nutrient compared to the control MF are required (Brasil, 1998). Standards for “reduced saturated fat” products are planned to be at least 30% SFA of the control product in Brazil, besides the conditions that the decreased saturated fat content must not result in an increased trans-FA, the reference product is not able to fill the requirements for a “low saturated fat” product, and

the energy given by SFA must not be above 10% of the total energy of the product ( ANVISA, 2011). According to these requisites, mousses I, WPC, I–WPC, and MF–I–WPC could receive the “low saturated fat” claim, oppositely to mousses MF–I and MF–WPC ( Table 7). For this kind of product, the U.S. and the E.U. legislation showed to be less restrictive regarding the comparative “reduced saturated fat” claim. This claim can be applied in the U.S. for all modified mousses, with the exception of mousse MF–WPC, once they all presented at least 25% less SFA than control mousse MF ( Table 6 and Table 7) ( US CFR, 2010f). Similarly, only mousse MF–WPC, with less than 30% SFA than control MF, also did not fill the requisite to receive this claim in the E.U. ( Table 6 and Table 7) ( EC, Talazoparib supplier 2007). In Brazil, the current nutritional information and claims for specific nutrients such as trans-FA ( ANVISA, 2003b) already consider their amounts per serving portion, which is equivalent to ½ cup (120 g) for milk-derived desserts ( ANVISA, 2003a). For all mousses studied, trans-FA content is lower than 0.2 g per serving portion of ½ cup (data not shown) and might be declared in Brazil as “zero” ( Table 7) ( ANVISA, 2003b). The acceptable upper limit for a “zero” trans-FA product is proposed

to be more severe, Mirabegron reducing to 0.1 g of this component per serving portion ( ANVISA, 2011), which implies that control mousse MF (0.109 g trans-FA/120 g) could not be declared as “zero trans-FA” following this standard ( Table 7). In the U.S., on the other hand, the legislation is more flexible in this situation: products that contain less than 0.5 g of trans-FA per serving portion, as in case of all mousses studied, are considered as “zero” or the statement “not a significant source of trans fat” is placed at the bottom of the table of nutrient values ( US CFR, 2010a). Such specific claims for trans-FA in food products are not contemplated by the E.U. legislation ( EC, 2007).