“Image registration between planning CT images and cone be


“Image registration between planning CT images and cone beam-CT (CBCT) images is one of the key technologies of image guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Current image registration methods fall roughly into two categories: geometric features-based and https://www.selleckchem.com/products/nu7441.html image grayscale-based. Mutual information (MI) based registration, which belongs to the latter category, has been widely

applied to multi-modal and monomodal image registration. However, the standard mutual information method only focuses on the image intensity information and overlooks spatial information, leading to the instability of intensity interpolation. Due to its use of positional information, wavelet transform has been applied to image registration recently. In this study, we proposed an approach to setup CT and cone beam-CT (CBCT) image registration in radiotherapy based on the combination of mutual information (MI) and stationary wavelet transform (SWT). Firstly, SWT was applied to generate gradient images and low frequency components produced in various levels of image decomposition were eliminated. Then inverse SWT was performed on the remaining frequency components. Lastly, the rigid registration of gradient images

and original images was implemented using a weighting function with the normalized mutual information (NMI) being the similarity measure, which compensates for the lack of spatial information in mutual information based image registration. Our experiment results showed that the proposed method was highly accurate and robust, and indicated a significant clinical potential in improving the accuracy of target localization in image guided radiotherapy Quizartinib (IGRT).”
“Major centers of motion in the rRNAs of Thermus thermophilus are identified by alignment of crystal structures of EF-G bound and EF-G unbound ribosomal subunits. Small rigid helices upstream of OICR-9429 these ‘pivots’

are aligned, thereby decoupling their motion from global rearrangements. Of the 21 pivots found, six are observed in the large subunit rRNA and 15 in the small subunit rRNA. Although the magnitudes of motion differ, with only minor exceptions equivalent pivots are seen in comparisons of Escherichia coli structures and one Saccharomyces cerevisiae structure pair. The pivoting positions are typically associated with structurally weak motifs such as noncanonical, primarily U-G pairs, bulge loops and three-way junctions. Each pivot is typically in direct physical contact with at least one other in the set and often several others. Moving helixes include rRNA segments in contact with the tRNA, intersubunit bridges and helices 28, 32 and 34 of the small subunit. These helices are envisioned to form a network. EF-G rearrangement would then provide directional control of this network propagating motion from the tRNA to the intersubunit bridges to the head swivel or along the same path backward.

Comments are closed.